Second: Does Mark Weber and ‘his’ IHR represent “ourselves?” Some questions for you.įirst: What race is Mark Weber running in? Does he have a goal? The IHR changed it’s mission statement under Weber to say it stands for “peace and justice.” Is that vague enough? Robert – You are being defensive toward Mark Weber and talking as if he somehow represents our whole movement. Also Irving told me and others in Sherman Oaks, Ca that he considered his testimony on behalf of Ernst Zundel a mistake. I might add that the German who told me this had first hand knowledge of this, it was not a story that had been passed around. Not too long ago a German told me that Irving had misquoted one of Hitler’s Secretaries and the misquote resulted in a patently false statement by Irving. Irving, I agree that he has done some good work initially, his Dresden book specifically, BUT as you know I have been traveling the Nation meeting with Germans who lived in the Third Reich.
I do not agree by Carolyn calling for more effectiveness, vision, and accountability that equals collaboration with the ADL neither Carolyn nor I wish to see an end to the IHR, which we both stated. The point was not an emphasis but an example of the IHR’s continued decline. By comparasion, UCLA also publishes, but when you call the main number at UCLA, they do not hear “Publisher”. By the way, the IHR has not published anything in many years. Certainly it is far more credible if a new caller, when calling heard “Good morning/afternoon, thank you for calling the Institute for Historic Review”. This needs to be put in proper constructive context, 1- at one time the IHR was very healthy and a Receptionist answered the phone at all times during business hours, emphasis on Receptionist and 2) why would a “Institute” answer the phone “Publisher”. If you recall, I said that I stated that I called on several occasions during business hours and an answer machine picked up OR when a person picked up it was Mr. Your example of the “answering machine” is a tad bit of an oversimplification.
Allow me to provide some clarification as to the discussion Re: the IHR. Thank you for your comments, I am happy to hear you enjoyed the programs we did on the Third Reich. Our nonexistence here on earth is at hand, and we hear that the IHR has voice mail!!! This is the most important movement in the world. And Weber and many others are talking the unutterable and have been demonized, and will be, to the end of their days on earth. I quote from Gemar’s research to people when discussing things with friends, but should I not unless I actually went to the chambers myself? Notwithstanding, David Irving’s masterful first hand research, everyone cannot duplicate first hand research, and most the time (when the source is responsible and reputable), should use the findings. As a historian, shouldn’t Mark Weber talk of Rudolf’s findings and incorporate them into his lectures? I think it is proper and responsible of him to do so. So he hasn’t gone to the gas chambers and taken samples to show the amounts of cyanide, and instead may quote the findings of a scientist/engineer like Gemar Rudolf that has impeccable credentials. Then we hear again that Weber doesn’t do enough of his own research. If I don’t do enough (in someone’s opinion) I hope I am not trashed for it endlessly. Someone could call me and get my voice mail and I hope I am not demonized. Then towards the end of the podcast, we again turn to destroying ourselves and use the same ole Mark Weber and the IHR “isn’t doing enough” and “Weber spends too much time raising funds.” Well heck, let’s just shoot ourselves in the foot before we even start trying to run the race ahead of us.īut hold on: Then we decide to tell everyone “when I called his office I only got an answering machine.” Now if there ever was a double standard this is it. These discussions are some of the most important things that I, or anyone else, could hear and learn from.
I first heard him on the Voice of Reason radio with Carolyn when he talked extensively on the culture of the Third Reich.
0 kommentar(er)
